为了进行两者的对比,我们再看看 Whole Language 的定义,来自 Wiki:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invented_spelling
Whole language describes a literacy philosophy which emphasizes that children should focus on meaning and strategy instruction. It is often contrasted with phonics-based methods of teaching reading and writing which emphasize instruction for decoding and spelling. However, from whole language practitioners' perspective, this view is erroneous and sets up a false dichotomy. Whole language practitioners teach to develop a knowledge of language including the graphophonic, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects of language. Within a whole language perspective, language is treated as a complete meaning-making system, the parts of which function in relational ways. It has drawn criticism by those who advocate "back to basics" pedagogy or reading instruction because whole language is based on a limited body of scientific research.
可以对照一下你的说法,和 Wiki 的定义。
说说我对整体认读(Whole Language)的理解:
1. Whole Language 认为语言是一个整体。具体到 单词 层面, 单词 就是 阅读语言 的最小组成单位,不需要再进一步拆分。每个单词有其特性,所以需要以单词为单位进行学习和记忆。
2. 大家都明白 Sight Words 记住之后,阅读起来比拼读快(拼读能否拼对先不管),那如果我们把所有单词都当作 Sight Words 呢?一个只会拼读的阅读者,和一个整体记住大量单词的阅读者,谁的效率更高?